negligence

Written By: Andrew Nichols

            You’re almost late for a meeting downtown and after grabbing a cup of coffee, you step between two parked cars and look both ways.  Not seeing any oncoming traffic, you dart across the street, only to be hit by a driver you didn’t see.  A driver who was on her cell phone, sending text messages and driving 20 MPH over the posted speed limit.  After you get out of the hospital, you limp into an attorney’s office, ready to sue the pants off the at-fault driver.  You’ve got thousands of dollars in medical bills, you’re currently unable to work and your doctor told you it’s possible you’re going to have a limp for the rest of your life.  After explaining the facts of your accident, you’re shocked when the attorney tells you there is nothing he can do for you.  Under Maryland law, the attorney says your claim is likely barred by contributory negligence.  

            What is contributory negligence?  It’s a legal standard that can completely prevent an injured party from recovering any monetary damages if they contributed to their own injuries in any way.  Contributory negligence is not followed in the majority of jurisdictions.  In fact, only Alabama, Maryland, Washington D.C., Virginia and North Carolina allow the defense of contributory negligence.  

            Contributory negligence is not an automatic defense or bar.  This means a judge or jury has to find as a factual determination that you were contributorily negligent.  However, it is a defense that is often used aggressively by at-fault drivers and their insurance companies, and for good reason.  I was involved in an appeal where a jury found contributory negligence on the part of an injured pedestrian who, at the time of trial, had been in a coma for 5 years after being struck by a driver who was rushing to make it through a yellow light at an intersection.  The injured plaintiff by all accounts was a great guy.  He had worked for a religious non-profit for 2 years and had 2 young children.  After deliberation, the jury found he had stepped off the sidewalk when he did not have the right-of-way and was contributorily negligent.  A man who would likely never awake from his coma and leave a widow and two young children behind was completely barred from recovering monetary damages.  

            Contributory negligence has a “sibling” that can also completely prevent you from recovering for injuries you sustain as a result of someone else’s negligence – assumption of the risk.  A plaintiff is said to “assume the risk” of injury if he or she voluntarily enters a dangerous situation fully aware of the risk involved.

            What is the practical application of these legal defenses for you?  When you’re getting ready to do something potentially stupid or reckless and you hear that voice in your head that says, “Hey, maybe this isn’t a good idea” – listen to that voice.  Always use reasonable caution and care, and always use a crosswalk.  

            If you have any further questions or would like to consult with Horman Nichols, please call 30.663.8101.